« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

March 2007

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Rachellemania

It's my blog and she's a soprano so I'm allowed to obsess. I love —

That in four performances her "Di, cor mio" has gone from basically lovely to drop dead ravishing.
That she seems to treat it differently every time.
That she can give Alcina a sense of humour without losing any of her evil credibility.
Her shimmering vibrato and stardust timbre.
The simultaneous fluidity and absolute precision of her coloratura.
Her awesome agility and limitless capacity for ornamentation.
That every one of those ornaments is imaginative and musically and dramatically right.
The transformation, in my mind at least, of "Ah, mio cor" from calculated to genuine emotion.
That while she's singing she makes me forget everyone — and I mean everyone — who's come before her.
Her eyes, which on their own are more expressive than anyone else's entire performance, and which are always acting even when the technical requirements of singing are controlling the rest of her.
The low, low interpolated note in "Ah, mio cor" which she's not afraid to hold for all its worth.
That in addition to everything it can do, her voice itself is thoroughly beautiful and recognisably her.
That she doesn't make me worry like the others in cast do.
The way she sings "pieta" in the da capo of "Non è amor ne gelosia".
That she silently turns Oberto's Act Three aria into her own mad scene instead.
The hurtling pace at which she takes "Ombre pallide" — and that she succeeds utterly.
That she takes her curtain call resplendent in her aquamarine Act Two dress rather than the beige one she ends the opera in.
That she makes me feel unbelievably fortunate to have been able to experience such a miraculous performance.
The impression she gives of total physical and vocal abandon — but abandon underpinned by absolute assurance and control, though that's probably an oxymoron.
That when I try to think of who, if anyone she reminds me of, it's names like Patrizia Ciofi and Sandrine Piau that come to mind.
The impossibility of putting her into words.
Her red hair.
Everything. Every note and phrase, every brilliant decoration, every gesture, every movement and expression. Every choice she's made (and I'd swear she makes a fair portion of them on the spot). Everything. She's sublime.

And now you can relax, though I'll live in torment — this is the last I'll see or hear of her now until whenever she returns to Opera Australia next year. According to her website she's doing two new productions for them next season. Again, I pray for a Lucia.

Rachellemania

It's my blog and she's a soprano so I'm allowed to obsess. I love —

That in four performances her "Di, cor mio" has gone from basically lovely to drop dead ravishing.
That she seems to treat it differently every time.
That she can give Alcina a sense of humour without losing any of her evil credibility.
Her shimmering vibrato and stardust timbre.
The simultaneous fluidity and absolute precision of her coloratura.
Her awesome agility and limitless capacity for ornamentation.
That every one of those ornaments is imaginative and musically and dramatically right.
The transformation, in my mind at least, of "Ah, mio cor" from calculated to genuine emotion.
That while she's singing she makes me forget everyone — and I mean everyone — who's come before her.
Her eyes, which on their own are more expressive than anyone else's entire performance, and which are always acting even when the technical requirements of singing are controlling the rest of her.
The low, low interpolated note in "Ah, mio cor" which she's not afraid to hold for all its worth.
That in addition to everything it can do, her voice itself is thoroughly beautiful and recognisably her.
That she doesn't make me worry like the others in cast do.
The way she sings "pieta" in the da capo of "Non è amor ne gelosia".
That she silently turns Oberto's Act Three aria into her own mad scene instead.
The hurtling pace at which she takes "Ombre pallide" — and that she succeeds utterly.
That she takes her curtain call resplendent in her aquamarine Act Two dress rather than the beige one she ends the opera in.
That she makes me feel unbelievably fortunate to have been able to experience such a miraculous performance.
The impression she gives of total physical and vocal abandon — but abandon underpinned by absolute assurance and control, though that's probably an oxymoron.
That when I try to think of who, if anyone she reminds me of, it's names like Patrizia Ciofi and Sandrine Piau that come to mind.
The impossibility of putting her into words.
Her red hair.
Everything. Every note and phrase, every brilliant decoration, every gesture, every movement and expression. Every choice she's made (and I'd swear she makes a fair portion of them on the spot). Everything. She's sublime.

And now you can relax, though I'll live in torment — this is the last I'll see or hear of her now until whenever she returns to Opera Australia next year. According to her website she's doing two new productions for them next season. Again, I pray for a Lucia.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Elsewhere

Mme Cieca has posted a couple of clips from Meyerbeer's Il crociato in Egitto at La Fenice, with Michael Maniaci and my adored Patrizia Ciofi as Armando/Elmireno and Palmide. Since this opera has a special place in my heart, I thought I'd respond in kind with a few Crociato excerpts of my own. From a live performance at Carnegie Hall in 1979 — "Con qual gioia", the final part of Palmide's Act Two scena; and the end of Armando's and Palmide's duet "Ravvisa qual'alma", which concludes the opera. And for a more direct comparison, here (from a 1992 recording which I've zero right to post) are the two parts of the Act One duet posted by La Cieca — "Ah, non ti son piu cara" and "Non v'e per noi piu speme". Who wins, I wonder.
[Please right-click those links and "Save As..." rather than running them directly from here. They'll stay here until the dictates of bandwidth usage, my guilty conscience or somebody's lawyers require their removal.]

Opera Chic and Herr Fury have both been discussing the merits (or otherwise) of the 1982 mini series Wagner, starring Richard Burton and featuring apparently every single other British actor of note they could fit in. Of course all that really interests me about this film is one entry in its seemingly endless cast list, a "Frau Dustmann". I'd willingly watch the whole nine hours, given the chance, to see just what her contribution really is. After all, I'm the person who has been not once, not twice, but three times through all eight hours of the unspeakable mess that is Melba, and for a similar reason.

Also via Opera Chic — reports that Renée Fleming's next project is "a recording of Appalachian folk music with authentic string instrumentation." Honestly, when I saw this quote I thought it must be a joke, until I followed the link to the article it comes from. No joke. Oh, Renée. I do love her, you know, and I plan to keep doing so — but she certainly doesn't make it easy. Just sing arias, Renée. You're really good at those.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Alta reina

Rachelle, Rachelle, Rachelle.

But perhaps it's dangerous to say her name three times — she is a witch, after all. A witch whose spell over me is stronger than ever tonight. And unlike Ruggiero, mine's not an involuntary state. I tried the ring on but there were no illusions to see through, it's all real. She's as outrageously brilliant as she seems so I'm staying put right here in her thrall.

She's back from the evil illness which kept her out of several performances, including, tragically, the one recorded for broadcast. I have missed her desperately. You'd think that such extravagant longing as mine might have swelled my expectations beyond reality, that when she finally returned I'd be perhaps a little disappointed. You'd be wrong. Her magic is strong; her reality exceeded my expectations, she was more magnificent even than I thought I remembered — a difficult feat, believe me.

Her Alcina is an enchantment and a privilege to experience. She's maybe the only true actress on that stage. There are convincing enough characterisations around her, yes, but they're rehearsed and unchanging. Rachelle's Alcina, on the other hand, seems a wholly spontaneous creation, different every time. So believable that she gives the impression she's the source of absolutely everything that happens around her — people move because she commands it, the set is changed because she's decided it should be, and even the music is her creation. By her reactions she turns other arias into her own — Oberto's "Barbara! Io ben lo so" isn't about Oberto's anguish at all any more, but about Alcina's desperate disintegration as she offers herself up as his victim. Back on opening night I suggested her Alcina was too essentially evil to be really sympathetic. I've changed my mind — the Alcina I saw tonight was shatteringly sympathetic. Even in her nastiest moments she's irresistible.

All of which would be hard enough for me to cope with on its own — but she can also sing. Again, with every performance she changes, there are new discoveries, new colours, new sounds. Her facility for coloratura can only be the result of a deal with the devil — except it's pretty gorgeously clear she's retained her soul. But she tears fearlessly into the most impossible runs and does so with such rock solid security that I'm fearless as I'm listening, too. I don't worry that she'll get blurry, or run out of breath, or miss a note — I'm free to abandon myself to the hair raising thrill of her. We're straying into beyond words territory here; I'm sitting and typing, all the while intensely aware that I'm capturing at best about 4% of the truth of the experience... and that all I really want to do is hear her sing again. There's just one performance left in the run. If I go I'll have to miss the first act. There's not a chance I'm missing the rest.

I think I meant to write more and/or different praise here but it's all too hard, nothing will say what I mean anyway. So I'll just invoke the sorceress again and hope for the best.

Rachelle, Rachelle, Rachelle.

I hope Opera Australia brings her back as much as they possibly can. At this point I feel would pay anything to hear her in anything. I see Lucia on her repertoire list and wonder if it's due a revival in Sydney. To those in New York — promise me you'll go and see her in Satyagraha. I'm praying for a broadcast.

P.S. I've received my stamp of Rachelle Devotee authenticity — having just written this post, I discovered this.

Alta reina

Rachelle, Rachelle, Rachelle.

But perhaps it's dangerous to say her name three times — she is a witch, after all. A witch whose spell over me is stronger than ever tonight. And unlike Ruggiero, mine's not an involuntary state. I tried the ring on but there were no illusions to see through, it's all real. She's as outrageously brilliant as she seems so I'm staying put right here in her thrall.

She's back from the evil illness which kept her out of several performances, including, tragically, the one recorded for broadcast. I have missed her desperately. You'd think that such extravagant longing as mine might have swelled my expectations beyond reality, that when she finally returned I'd be perhaps a little disappointed. You'd be wrong. Her magic is strong; her reality exceeded my expectations, she was more magnificent even than I thought I remembered — a difficult feat, believe me.

Her Alcina is an enchantment and a privilege to experience. She's maybe the only true actress on that stage. There are convincing enough characterisations around her, yes, but they're rehearsed and unchanging. Rachelle's Alcina, on the other hand, seems a wholly spontaneous creation, different every time. So believable that she gives the impression she's the source of absolutely everything that happens around her — people move because she commands it, the set is changed because she's decided it should be, and even the music is her creation. By her reactions she turns other arias into her own — Oberto's "Barbara! Io ben lo so" isn't about Oberto's anguish at all any more, but about Alcina's desperate disintegration as she offers herself up as his victim. Back on opening night I suggested her Alcina was too essentially evil to be really sympathetic. I've changed my mind — the Alcina I saw tonight was shatteringly sympathetic. Even in her nastiest moments she's irresistible.

All of which would be hard enough for me to cope with on its own — but she can also sing. Again, with every performance she changes, there are new discoveries, new colours, new sounds. Her facility for coloratura can only be the result of a deal with the devil — except it's pretty gorgeously clear she's retained her soul. But she tears fearlessly into the most impossible runs and does so with such rock solid security that I'm fearless as I'm listening, too. I don't worry that she'll get blurry, or run out of breath, or miss a note — I'm free to abandon myself to the hair raising thrill of her. We're straying into beyond words territory here; I'm sitting and typing, all the while intensely aware that I'm capturing at best about 4% of the truth of the experience... and that all I really want to do is hear her sing again. There's just one performance left in the run. If I go I'll have to miss the first act. There's not a chance I'm missing the rest.

I think I meant to write more and/or different praise here but it's all too hard, nothing will say what I mean anyway. So I'll just invoke the sorceress again and hope for the best.

Rachelle, Rachelle, Rachelle.

I hope Opera Australia brings her back as much as they possibly can. At this point I feel would pay anything to hear her in anything. I see Lucia on her repertoire list and wonder if it's due a revival in Sydney. To those in New York — promise me you'll go and see her in Satyagraha. I'm praying for a broadcast.

P.S. I've received my stamp of Rachelle Devotee authenticity — having just written this post, I discovered this.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Rusalka

My expectations, I'll admit right now, were shamefully low. And I have no decent or reasonable explanation for this — well, not really. Mostly it was on account of the dire ENO Rusalka I watched on TV a while back. Nothing about that production made me want to like the opera and I really didn't relish the prospect of returning to it. I included it in my subscription in part to make sure I felt obliged to go. Neither did the Opera Australia cast set my heart aflame. I've made my distaste for Rosario La Spina pretty clear already; and since her Jenufa — even though it was fine — I've been having rather uncharitable thoughts about Cheryl Barker and didn't expect to be bowled over by her Rusalka.

I wasn't wrong on every count — but I was certainly wrong on enough of them to make last night a truly magnificent experience. First things first — the music itself, which I adored, and I didn't think I would. I remember last time thinking the whole opera just sounded like a two-and-a-half hour extended remix of the Song to the Moon. Which, yes, it kind of does. But now that Wagner-light (or should that be Wagner-leit?) aspect appeals to me much more than it did and I like the musical world which those recurring themes create. Though the constant "Here comes Rusalka, get out your harp" moments do become a bit comical. And of course Dvorak does something which I always love composers for — follows the big hit aria not with a big conclusive bang, but with music which prevents those people from clapping and spoiling the flow. Obviously I don't know the opera well enough to say much about the orchestra under (him again) Richard Hickox — but what I do know is that they all played gorgeously enough to change my mind, which is something in itself.

And Cheryl. I take back everything I thought. Once she gets going, this woman is sensational. It was announced before the curtain rose that she had been suffering from bronchitis and asked for our understanding. To begin with it seemed to me the bronchitis had no effect, she just sounded pretty much as she had in Jenufa. As an actress she was brilliant — unequivocally the star even while her character remained silent — and she looked drop dead gorgeous, but the singing to me was unremarkable, her voice expressive enough but possessing no particular individuality or distinctive beauty. Then Rusalka drank her potion and was mute. And when, in Act Two, she finally spoke again — Cheryl's true voice returned too, in all its high voltage glory. Her Rusalka became as aurally fascinating as she was visually and dramatically, slicing vividly through the sometimes very thick orchestration but retaining all the aquamarine loveliness you could wish for from your not-so-little mermaid. She's won me over.

Not so her Prince, but that's hardly a surprise. Rosario La Spina sings the whole thing as if it's Puccini, and not even good Puccini at that. Most of the music he approaches like a crossover "tenor" and when it's too big for that type of sound, he shouts at approximate pitch instead. Supposedly royal, he displays not one shred of princely dignity — when following the Foreign Princess along the red carpet he actually managed to stand on her dress. The Prince was never destined to be a very sympathetic figure but his is so utterly lacking in any kind of human credibility as to render Rusalka's sacrifice quite incomprehensible — only Cheryl's magic performance keeps it believable.

Elsewhere in the cast, however, the standard is reassuringly higher. Elizabeth Whitehouse is majestic as the Foreign Princess, filling the opera house with a huge flood of sound in a way I've never experienced before. A sort of voice one feels surrounded by, and remarkably fresher and more overwhelming than her Kostelnicka which was in itself a triumph. The Princess' place in the story should be roughly that of the Baroness in The Sound of Music but I liked her. (Actually I like the Baroness too.) I wished she could band together with Rusalka and leave the Prince alone with his ego. Another standout for me was Sian Pendry — a Young Artist this year — as the Kitchen Boy. I don't think every singer would make a star turn out of this role but she did; I suspect she may prove a mezzo to be reckoned with. Bruce Martin is an excellent Water Sprite, a grounded, rough edged voice among all the soprano radiance.  Though with his endlessly repeated "Alas! My poor, pale Rusalka" he began to remind me of the Greta Garbo's unbelievably irritating father in Anna Christie, who talks about "'dat old devil sea" until you just want to push him into it. But I digress. Anne-Marie Owens' Jezibaba was slightly patchy but mostly fine —  I sound like a weather report — but with a bit too much vibrato and too little pure evil for me. The Wood Nymphs were adorable in their mini skirts (yes) and boots (yes) dancing a quasi-Macarena (yes) while they sang their opening trio.

Olivia Fuchs' production is the kind which will appeal to some and utterly repel others. She rejects the story as a fairytale and re-casts in much starker and more abstract form. Not much of a set — basically an empty stage with a tiny circular pond in the centre and dotted with the odd block of ice, all of it colourless, variously lit in vivid blues, reds and silvers. The boundaries between land and water are constantly blurred and crossed — it's little wonder Rusalka is such a mess. So far, so good — I liked the icy, eerie atmosphere of it. One problem, however — Jezibaba. She's no longer a witch. She's a stout, scalpel-wielding nurse in a white coat, who enacts Rusalka's transformation on a hospital bed. And takes inappropriately comical glee in the process — so that in what ought to be  a hushed sort of moment, as Rusalka becomes mortal, instead the audience is full of giggles. This Rusalka is being recorded for Chandos; lord knows what listeners to that CD will make of this without a visual reference. I see, vaguely, the rationale behind all this but I think it's very misguided and just a bad decision. A Jezibaba in keeping with the look and feel of the rest of the production would be miles more effective — we're supposed to see cold, clinical evil but what I see is cold, clinical absurdity. Rusalka on crutches in the final act was just foolish. 

Still, even that's not enough to do serious harm to this Rusalka. There are weaknesses, yes — but there are also some serious strengths and it's these which triumph. For me it was bliss to spend an evening just immersed in the complete experience, musical and dramatic, where even the aspects I disliked were at least interesting enough to think about. For once in my life I probably won't go again — not because it doesn't deserve it but because I just don't think I need to; once was richly satisfying enough to last me quite a while.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Delius Songs - Yvonne Kenny

For the first time since I fell, Yvonne has a new solo CD out — a disc of Delius songs on Hyperion. And I tried but failed to find a more normal way to deal with it. So here it is, a track by track celebration.   

Twilight Fancies and Young Venevil both appeared on The Salley Gardens. The versions here are both... what's the word I'm looking for? Oh, that's it — better. They just are. Her diction is better, they make more sense musically, their meaning is clearer. Hidden Love is gorgeous melodrama and the kind of song I might expect her to blur a little in making it as aurally beautiful as possible but it's crystal clear in fact, which is good because there's a story to tell, and she tells it. The Minstrel is among my new favourites. It makes fabulous use of her low low register which is stronger and more thrilling all the time. But what I love most about it is this pair of lines, written by Ibsen and translated by Peter Pears just for me to hear sung by her — "She'd listen to all of my singing / She'd follow me everywhere." Sound like anyone we know? The Bird's Story is perhaps where the normal reviewers start making tactful comments about her upper register but really it's only under the tiniest bit of pressure and any strain is pretty much diffused by her masterful dynamic control. Cradle Song is perfect peace. Ever since the "Wiegenlied" on her Wigmore Hall recital she's my number one singer of the Art Lullaby because she makes them just sound like lullabies sung to actual children. This is no exception, and sits in probably the easiest and most beautiful part of her voice. The Homeward Way has a slightly sappy text but she's sincere enough to mask that and at the same time proves her upper register isn't in quite such peril after all. In the Garden of the Seraglio isn't nearly as Oriental or exotic at you'd think but just her drenched violet "in drowsy air" is evocative enough. Irmelin Rose is a fun little fairytale miniature in which she takes clear delight. A bit of a metallic edge shows itself as the song progresses but it's expressive and quite appropriate really. Il pleure dans mon coeur is the first of four Verlaine settings. Languorous and semi-French, which I don't think is either Delius' forte or hers, but they both of them do quite nicely just the same. Le ciel est, par-dessus le toit is definitely more interesting though it's hard not to hear Fauré's "Prison". She's as expressively alive as ever, even without the latter's big, swelling "Qu'as tu fait". La lune blanche is a bit like "Il pleure" really. These settings if nothing else are nice opportunity to display her still-radiant (in fact maybe more radiant than ever) pianissimi, particularly on her "exquise" which is, indeed, exquise. Chanson d'automne is different from the other three, a bit more of a sway to it. It reminds me a little of Poulenc's "Violon" and in fact there are violins in this text too. Her French diction is limpid and clear; it's also less and less French (though still accurate) with every passing year but this of course is a part of her considerable charm. Summer Eve is a jolly, sunny sort of tune, which succeeds because she keeps things light and simple, sings with warmth but doesn't over-do it (either by taking it too seriously or by making it too cutesy). Longing is a bit unconvincing to be honest — I blame Delius. Too fast for that weary, Mariana kind of yearning but not exciting enough to sound desperate and impassioned either. Those acquired-taste high(ish) notes make another appearance but actually if you listen, it's still a beautiful sound. Sunset  (Delius' is a bit cheerier and less laden with death than Strauss' Abendrot) is another reminder to me of the extraordinary richness of her present day voice. Gold, mahogany, red wine — my kingdom for an original piece of imagery. The nightingale has a lyre of gold is a bright, straightforward, about-birds kind of song, and then at the end she sends a shiver up my spine with "sang / Our hearts and lips together". I-Brasil begins with the single most seductively sung "there's" in the history of recorded music, ends with a shimmeringly piano "away" and in between is the most intoxicating track on the CD. Among her most beautiful moments on record. Summer Landscape is just that, the point being that the colours and shades of her voice describe that landscape better even than the actual text. O schneller, mein Ross — I always love to hear her sing in German — is another of these perfectly balanced moments, semi-operatic ecstasy but which doesn't crush the song's lighthearted spirit. Aus deinen Augen fliessen meine Lieder I'm in love with. Before I'd even heard it to the end I felt it had always been in my life. So white, so soft, so sweet is she is terribly, terribly gorgeous — what business has anyone making such an amazing sound on words like "the nard in the fire" and "the bag of the bee"? To Daffodils surprises me every time with its variety and its wealth of opportunities for her to sing in ways that weaken my knees. Love's Philosophy doesn't match Quilter's but comes closer than I used to think; until I heard her sing it, I thought he'd missed the point completely but it seems that impression was down to the singers and not the song — in her hands it's spot-on. Summer Nights comes as the perfect conclusion. Everything I've praised above in one two-and-a-half minute song. Except a perfect conclusion is impossible — I'd rather no conclusion. Time she recorded the other thirty-eight songs he wrote.

My greatest joy in this disc is the radiant simplicity with which she has approached the whole programme, her willingness to scale down her voice and just let the essential, natural beauty of her singing speak for itself. You might say it's the serious, grown up version of The Salley Gardens. And I'd place it among her most musically and intellectually satisfying albums. Maybe that's because unlike The Salley Gardens and others, this isn't an ABC Classics "Australia's Favourite Soprano" venture. It's centred on the composer instead; she's there to serve him, functioning purely as an artist rather than an image or an icon. Which isn't to say her ABC recitals lack depth; she's incapable of anything but complete commitment. But this disc proves she doesn't need to be packaged like a star to shine like one. Shine she does; and for me she's the sun.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

La clemenza di Tito

I just know I'm about to start repeating myself. A while back I wrote about Harmonia Mundi's pretty special La clemenza di Tito, led by the ever-brilliant René Jacobs. Now I've gone and bought myself the DG Tito which came out at around the same time — Charles Mackerras with the Scottish Chamber Orchestra and Magdalena Kozena in the lead. And I wonder how many original things there are to say at this point about a new(ish) Clemenza. Words like revelatory inevitably arise, but I think perhaps we're past all that and can just accept that, while it ain't Cosi or Die Zauberflöte and never will be, is nevertheless just not as boring and dry as we (or I, at least) have been accustomed to suggest. It's Mozart, after all — how dare I be mean to it?

Anyway. Charles Mackerras — who I'll see here in Sydney later this year, conducting Mozart and Strauss — does gorgeous things. This Clemenza lacks the electric energy and urgency of the Jacobs recording, but makes up for it in sheer wallowable beauty. Jacobs gives us surprising Mozart; Mackerras gives us the gloriously familiar version — I'm happy with both. Magdalena as Sesto is... well, she's Magdalena, and I've already made my position clear in this respect: Magdalena Is Perfect. She is. I don't think I'll even try to come up with any other adjectives. Rainer Trost as Tito, however, made me miss Mark Padmore, who sang the role on the Harmonia Mundi recording. Trost is fine, I suppose, but just a bit too strained and one-dimensional for me. Hillevi Martinpelto is the kind of Vitellia I want — suitably dramatic, a little bit nasty, but still Mozartian through and through — but not, I have to say, in a way which I found particularly exciting. Still, I liked her well enough. Christine Rice and Lisa Milne as Annio and Servilia respectively are both them pretty much ideally cast. Christine's Annio is a nice vocal complement to Magdalena, the voices (which aren't too dissimilar) blending beautifully but always easily distinguishable from one another. Lisa Milne is lovely of course, as she was in the Zauberflöte Met broadcast way back when. And she beats Sunhae Im (Servilia for Harmonia Mundi) hands down, singing with all the requisite sweetness and light but with none of the latter's oddly soubrettish mannerisms. Im, though not without her appeal, made Servilia sound like Zerlina; Lisa, on the other hand, makes her sound like what she is — young and pretty, yes, but also the kind of Roman aristocracy Tito could consider marrying. Oh, and we can't forget the token compliment for Publio. I expect I've said this about every Publio I've heard, and will continue to do so in future, but too bad. Here it is: John Relyea was excellent as Publio. Enough? Probably not, but it will have to do.

When the two recordings of La clemenza di Tito arrived so close together, reviewers seemed to feel obliged to declare one or t'other superior. Me, I declare victory on neither side. Why choose?

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Quasi Alcina

It had to happen to me one day, and at least it wasn't Montserrat Caballé. I arrived at my third Alcina — despite having been sold a seat which didn't exist — only to learn that Terrifying Rachelle, my Number One Witch, was indisposed. I didn't riot; but I confess I could understand why a person might in such circumstances. I was thankful for my own obsessive tendencies, which meant I knew what I was missing. Most of Thursday's audience, of course, didn't and likely never will, which is a shame.

All due credit to her replacement though, lovely Hye Seoung Kwon. Hye Seoung has been singing Oberto with, it has to be said, the kind of power and talent which screams for a bigger role. Maybe not Alcina though, or at least not just yet. But it would be monstrously unfair to subject her to the usual criticism when she's stepped in at such short notice. And in any case she actually did pretty damned well; not her A Chorus Line moment, no, but still a success.

But Rachelle, ti imploro — get well soon. Absence makes the grow fonder, it's true. With Rachelle gone, I missed her desperately and appreciated her myriad glories even more than before. All the things which come of a long rehearsal process and plenty of preparation time, which can't be expected of a last minute replacement, however talented — these I longed for. I don't think I'd fully realised how exquisitely detailed her performance is, the number of near-imperceptible (but vital) gestures, facial expressions and reactions. Even the position she assumes to summon her dark magic is uniquely hers, it turns out; and then there's the fabulously wicked moment where, as Oberto holds a glass of water from the enchanted fountain but doesn't drink it, Alcina, glowering and evil, mouths "Beviamo!" All this and more, I adore, and it all needs to return. So Rachelle, since I'm sure you're actually a witch, cast every necessary spell and come back immediately. Your realm and your subjects need you. 

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Neruda songs

When Lorraine Hunt Lieberson died, the blogosphere was overwhelmingly filled with tributes from every person whose life she had even slightly touched. And indeed it seemed there was nobody whose life she had only slightly touched — anyone who had encountered her voice or her spirit, however briefly, felt it long afterwards and profoundly. I know that every time I listened to her I was in awe of her. Still, when she died I tried to be careful, and not to claim a stronger link than existed. I've always been bothered by the tendency among some, when an artist dies, to only at that point become a follower and a fan, to mourn them with a passion umatched by anything one expressed when that person was alive. No singer should have to die to be adored. So I posted a tribute, a brief one, and I did nothing else. Lorraine Hunt Lieberson was a singer I thought the world of but the truth, after all, is that I owned one CD (her Bach arias) which I only occasionally had the strength to listen to; and had borrowed her Handel arias from the library once, gloried in them for two weeks and then never heard them since. When I signed up to iTunes, I downloaded a track from a much earlier Handel arias disc. Nothing more. She was magnificent but I cannot claim devotion, worthy though she was (and is) of it. It might come, with time, but it would be disingenous — and do her no justice — to manufacture it.

All this is by way of attempting to explain the position from which I come to her recording of her husband's Neruda Songs, which I've listened to for the first time this afternoon. There are different kinds of responses which a work created in these particular personal circumstances might evoke. I know that for some they may prove too much to bear, that for those close to Lorraine (and I suspect you need not ever have met her to feel close to her) the response will be — and rightly so — wholly emotional. And nobody could remain wholly detached; if you knew neither of their names and none of their history until buying this CD, you still could not fail to grasp the beauty and the heartbreak of this song cycle.

Still I want to write about these songs as songs too. We can't separate them from their own particular story — but if that story didn't exist, and the songs still did, they would matter just the same, and be just as disarming, just as strikingly beautiful. They would be differently extraordinary but they would, nevertheless, be extraordinary. Lieberson's music sways and glows, languid and peacefully summery without ever becoming lazy or insubstantial. It's underpinned by a radiant and determinedly passionate energy, its emotional world defined positively and fearlessly. The songs are inseparable from their singer — Lorraine is as much their creator as her husband. Her voice of course is of uncommon beauty, incandescent,  and the palette of expression she draws from more varied, more subtly shaded than could be imagined. She is limitless. What makes her performance aoll the more arresting is that everything flows so utterly naturally. There's not a trace of artifice, of calculation or of self-indulgence; she's patently incapable of all three. Text and music are heavy with strong feelings and she expresses every one with complete and exquisite sincerity. To call her ideal for this music is both obvious and inadequate; she simply is this music.

Beauty is beauty is beauty I think. Lorraine created beauty constantly and effortlessly. These songs have a particular kind of emotional weight because she died. Were she still alive, the nature of that weight might be different — but it would be just as heavy, and the songs just as beautiful.