« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 2007

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Happiness

  • Turning the radio on late one night and discovering a ravishing Barbara Bonney in a recording of Acis and Galatea (auf Deutsch) which I never even knew she'd made.
  • More revelatory Barbara — hearing her disc of operetta arias for the first time in a couple of years and realising it's about a million times more gorgeous than I'd thought. The sort of thing I could just play on loop all day.
  • Mirella's Juliette. Mirella's Liu. Mirella's Marguerite. Mirella.
  • Seven front row seats booked nine months ago for a show which has now — deservedly — sold out.
  • Ten dollars for Natalie's Vocalises.
  • Lucia Popp in Strauss lieder, half-hidden away at the end of a Margaret Price CD. "Schlagende Herzen" in liquid gold.
  • Joyce. On stage, on record, on her blog and in the news — via singing'rin — that she's been signed by Virgin Classics. May I please sign up now for absolutely everything she ever chooses to release? There's even to be (swoon) an Alcina (!) for (another swoon) Alan Curtis.
  • Waiting for Barbiere to start, gazing idly into the stalls from my D-Reserve loge seat and all of a sudden realising — I know that jaw. That's Joan Sutherland. 

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Il Barbiere di Siviglia

After several months of withdrawal symptoms, Opera Australia has returned to Sydney, and Tuesday night saw the opening of the Winter Season with Leon Krasenstein's brightly coloured and cartoonish production of Rossini's Il Barbiere di Siviglia.

Amidst an extravagant set inspired by Gaudi — though apparently realised by Disney — Krasenstein has shifted the action of the opera to a 1930s spa. Doctor Bartolo actually works as a doctor, Berta as a quasi-nurse, and there's even a clutch of mute guests thrown in for good measure — among them a pair of ornamental toreadors and a wildy moustachioed Salvador Dali. Visually the new setting is an appealing one and it has its share of comic charm. In terms of plot, however, the move seems both unnecessary and, at times, obstructive. Exchanges between Rosina and Almaviva which should take place outside are now happening indoors, with the Count halfway up the stairs and Rosina at the top. It's hard to see why they don't elope then and there — the usual locks and bolts preventing their elopement have disappeared and Rosina seems pretty easily accessible. Parts of the set seem to alternate between being outside and in, so that we have Figaro and Almaviva propping a ladder against a wall despite being about two feet from the internal staircase. Obviously there's a need for suspension of disbelief and all that but I can't help wondering whether a happy compromise might have been reached — keep the wacky Gaudi-esque aesthetic and the 1930s setting, but use them to create a slightly more conventional (and logical) arena for the action.

Barbiere is an opera which offers up three potential protagonists. Since every intrigue turns about her — and since she's the (mezzo) soprano — it can, if so desired, be Rosina's opera. It can also be the Count's; after all, it premiered under the title Almaviva. Or it can be, just as the title suggests, an opera about Seville's most indispensable barber. It's a question of casting and of directorial vision — and in this case there's not a shadow of a doubt that Figaro is our star. José Carbo is thoroughly in his element here. Both his comic timing and his bel canto technique are effortlessly idiomatic and quite irresistible. He glides through Figaro's coloratura with rich and ringing tone and exudes such charm you'd suspect he really was born Raffaello. Certainly he was born for this role — it's obvious how completely at ease he is when he starts throwing a bit of fancy footwork in to complement the fastest passage of "Largo al factotum". Evidently nothing in this role presents a challenge for José — it's a perfect match and a total success.

Amelia Farrugia turns in a very creditable performance as Rosina. This is her debut in the role and no doubt there is improvement to come, but even on her first night there was much to admire — she sounded far better last night than the last time I heard her live (as Manon in 2005) and certainly has improved since her recital disc Joie de vivre. Her upper register was brighter and more cleanly focused than I expected, her coloratura exactly as showy and silvery as it needed to be. Her ornamentation in "Una voce poco fa" was impressive if occasionally slightly wayward; but by the time of Rosina's singing lesson she was more settled and tossed off the interpolated Proch variations with style and shimmer. There's perhaps a tendency to squeeze the highest notes just a little but it does little to detract from the undeniable prettiness of her sound. My concern, though, is that she has lavished all possible care and attention upon the top end of her voice and neglected the rest. On Tuesday her lower register sounded breathy and artificial — the recitative in particular was delivered in a mannered quasi Sprechstimme and could stand to sound a whole lot more tuneful. Onstage she's an energetic and self-assured presence. Personally I found her Rosina wholly unsympathetic, a manipulative and superficial brat, but that's just a matter of taste — like her or not, it's certainly a vivid characterisation.

As a roly-poly, happy go lucky Count Almaviva, Henry Choo is quite charming but ultimately miscast. His smooth, honeyed tenor is a gorgeous sound but it's not suited to the rapid-fire demands of Rossini and as a result he comes off sounding weaker than he really is. He sounds like a Don Ottavio who has wandered into the wrong opera — quite lovely, but out of place. The contrast with Kanen Breen's darker, more solid sound will prove telling, I suspect, when Breen takes over the role in August. Warwick Fyfe was to have been our Don Bartolo but proved indisposed — the role was taken over at (presumably) short notice and with great aplomb by Andrew Moran, in what appears to be only his third Opera Australia role. Don Basilio was my compatriot Conal Coad, in his usual fine form, done up to look repulsively Rasputinesque and pulling out all his buffo basso tricks — "La calunnia" was a comical whirlwind. Lovely, too, to see Rosemary Gunn as Berta. I'd previously only ever seen her on DVD as Cornelia in Giulio Cesare — the thirteen years since that production have apparently done little to alter her voice and it was nice that Berta was given her aria to sing.

Our maestro was, of course, Richard Bonynge. If there's anybody I'm willing to trust with bel canto, it's him. He managed to pull off that overture without turning it into musical caricature and despite the odd mishap in the pit, he had the AOBO sounding warm and vibrant all evening. He seems to have aimed not so much for rollicking farce as for commedia dell'arte panache, and I think that approach, while it mightn't have audiences bouncing up and down in their seats in rhythm, nevertheless has a definite appeal. Bonynge's tempi mightn't be the speediest but the evening flies by pleasurably just the same.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Mirella!

Somebody explain to me, please, about Mirella.

I have been slow to start with Mirella. Until a few weeks ago she had for many years been very much in the background. I have praised her as perfection itself for her Susanna and her Micaela on DVD and have always readily accepted her as the One True Mimi. That was all, though. She simply did not feature in my day-to-day soprano life, or even on an occasional basis. I liked her in theory but even when I was fresh from experiencing her adorable loveliness in the above-mentioned role, I never felt a need to pursue her. She charmed me but didn't tempt me to follow her.

Then a little while ago at work I played a "Best of Puccini" compilation. All the usual stuff. And there, suddenly, was her "Si, mi chiamano Mimi" and I was smitten. Obviously I must have heard this before and yet it was a revelation. For the first time I was excited about Mirella. So I was good. I followed this discovery up immediately with The Very Best of Mirella Freni. And was immediately flooded with adoration. She is sublime. I love her. This disc just overflows with musicality and sensitivity and vocal glory. Expressive and personal singing and at the same time it's a lesson to all sopranos in how to do it properly. Send a copy to Anna Netrebko — Mirella has a way of singing both the stuff Anna should and the stuff Anna shouldn't and doing it all impeccably well. She finds her own, lyric soprano way into the intricacies of bel canto coloratura. And with the Puccini she turns me into a weepy hopeless cliché, for once reacting to all that Italian heartstring-pulling in just the way I'm supposed to. Never ever — not even with Renata — has "Un bel di" affected me so much; I had to grip the escalator rail tight so I didn't fall apart. The sweet little flutter she puts into the word "amore" in "Vien diletto" just makes me swoon. "Senza mamma" shatters me even more than usual. Aria after aria just gets to me. Head swimming beauty.

And so, flushed with all this freshly discovered love, I returned to work and played another "Best of" disc. This time, Mirella Freni: A Celebration. I was all set for another surfeit of delight. I chose disc two, my mouth watering at the prospect of her Elisabetta, her Tatiana. But oh... it wasn't the same. Well, I don't think it was. Perhaps it was the wrong day, perhaps I was in the wrong state of mind. Or perhaps — is it wrong to think it? — it's her. I took a look at the liner notes and saw most of disc two came from much later, from around the eighties. The Very Best Of is mostly sixties recordings, with only a few later tracks — and those are the heavier ones, Aida and the like, and (just slightly) the ones which appeal less.

So is this my explanation? Is there a point at which Mirella loses a bit of gloss, pushes too hard and isn't quite as magic as before? Or is it perhaps not quite so simple? Maybe I need a bit more patience. Maybe I need to revisit the later recordings and give her a chance. I don't know. Ridiculous as it seems, I'm new to Mirella. (How could anybody be? And yet I am.) So I appeal to all those who know her better, who've loved her longer and more comprehensively. Direct me, advise me. I already love her, so that's not the issue — but more I understand her, the deeper and better I can love her. I've made the discovery at long last and it's magnificent; but I should hate to find myself confined to just the one CD. Sopranos deserve expansive adoration and that's what I'd like to give her.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Preliminary thoughts on Barbiere

I have issues with Il Barbiere di Siviglia. Actually I don't, but somehow I always think that I do. Generally speaking, my affection for Rossini knows (almost) no bounds but faced with Barbiere I just tend to think — couldn't we have La Cenerentola instead? Or, for that matter, Les dialogues des Carmelites or L'oca del Cairo or, well, anything else? I don't dislike it but in theory, Barbiere bores me. In theory. In practice, for the most part, you throw me into it and I realise that in fact I like it quite a lot. I don't know quite what it is that makes me feel this way — though I have a sneaking suspicion it might be the preponderance of men in the cast — or why the idea persists no matter how many times I'm proven wrong. Anyway, there it is. But Barbiere is swiftly approaching the opera house so once again I have to ignore my inner voices (who are often wrong anyway — they thought I wouldn't love Rusalka) and rustle up at the very least some synthetic excitement about the beginning of the winter season. Excitement which will no doubt promptly be made genuine by the alchemy of live performance.

I'm prepared either to love or hate the Gaudi-inspired sets. Although honestly, unless they're just nauseatingly ridiculous and actually obstruct the course of the opera, I can't imagine that anything so whimsical would really stir up true hatred in me. Annoyance, maybe. However at the moment the weird directorial concept with which I'm anticipating having most difficulty is the Entführung-in-an-airport. Barbiere in a spa seems just harmlessly silly.

And there's José Carbo to look forward to as Figaro. I expect nothing less than irresistible brilliance from José, for the simple reason that that's all I've ever known him to deliver. I first saw him back home as Escamillo and he was just preposterously charming. As the Count in Le nozze di Figaro he was once again in his element; I have no doubt he can manage the swap to Figaro with panache. I'm more drawn to his voice every time I hear it. It ain't huge but it's streamlined and stylish and that's the kind of voice I for one mostly prefer.

I'm a bit fascinated by the double casting of Almaviva. Until July 31st we have Henry Choo; after that it's Kanen Breen. Which means two very different Almavivas. Henry has one of those limpid, liquid voices that make all the girls go weak at the knees — myself sometimes included. But to me he seems a bit boyish, his style of comedy a bit too sweet and jolly, to be a thoroughly convincing Count. Whereas Kanen Breen, though lacking some of that obvious vocal splendour, is just the kind of singer I would cast. And one of the funniest in the Opera Australia stable. When I sat, semi-involuntarily, through five performances of Il signor Bruschino, only Kanen could make me forget I was just waiting for what followed — there were certain gestures and facial expressions which, even on the fifth night, made me laugh as if it was the first. He was a scream in Sweeney Todd too — I was terribly upset when he was murdered.

I suppose Amelia Farrugia's Rosina will at least be a learning experience. I haven't heard for a very long time, not since her Manon in 2005. Except the tracks I heard from her recital disc Joie de vivre, about which the less said the better. So far, then, I've had no cause to fall in love with her — not even close. But all the same, I've really very little idea of what to expect from her Rosina and it would be ridiculous to write her off before the fact. We shall see. It will be nice to see Conal Coad — my compatriot — as Basilio. Like any good buffo basso, he has a definite knack for stealing shows. And I'm hoping to like Warwick Fyfe more as Bartolo than I have in any of his other roles — seems to me that the weaknesses in his Rigoletto and his Germont père might just prove to be strengths in a role like this. I'm happy too to have Richard Bonynge conducting — Rossini is his kind of territory. Of course the thing I really like best about Richard Bonynge is his wife, which is perhaps a bit unfair, but unfortunately can't be helped.

So all I need to do now is actually buy tickets to the thing. 10 days and counting...

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Ach, Konstanze

I adore the Countess Almaviva. I like Fiordiligi a lot. I think Aspasia's pretty magnificent and I have a soft spot for Vitellia. But I can't make my mind up about Konstanze. Whereas with other Mozartian women my feelings are pretty well established regardless of individual intepretations, with Konstanze it's different. I'm much more at the whim of whichever soprano has the guts to take her on. So sometimes I love her, sometimes I'm indifferent and sometimes I find her downright irritating. You could compare her to the Countess, a gorgeous portrait of fragile dignity; or you could just call her a boring Fiordiligi with even worse taste in tenors.

I suppose the question is — does she really truly want Belmonte? Is their reunion a genuinely happy ending? Bassa Selim, despite being a harem-keeping infidel, is a far more sophisticated and dignified figure than Belmonte, who just spends the opera being a typical Gormless Mozart Tenor. This is the question which gets raised time and time again in discussing Entführung and it's worth thinking about. Though at the same time I can't help wondering — for Mozart and his librettist Stephanie, did the question even exist? Surely for them, Die Entführung is about entertainment and hijinks in an exotic locale — not self sacrifice and cultural difference and all the deep meaningful stuff we're determined to read into everything.

However be that as it may, I do like the idea that Konstanze would stay with Selim if she could. When she sings "Ach, ich liebte" it seems clear that she and Belmonte hadn't been together long before they were separated. I wonder if maybe her affections are cooling — but seeing as he's embarked on this dangerous mission to rescue her, she really has no choice now but to stay with him. Gratitude and duty over romantic fervour (or lack thereof). And it's definitely possible to use "Martern aller Arten", which has to be one of the craziest arias Mozart ever threw at an unsuspecting soprano, as another depiction of this inner turmoil. The idea being that it becomes more of a sort of abstract and fragmented mad scene than a specific declaration of bravery. She appeals to me much more in this state than if we see her as tediously chaste and well behaved. There's a production on DVD from Zürich which (despite the cameraman's disconcerting hand fetish) does quite a beautiful job of all of this. By the end it's excruciatingly clear that the deep, grown-up relationship Konstanze has is with Selim and that he has totally fallen for her (and probably would never have carried out his threats of "Martern von aller Arten" anyway) but they're realistic about it. She goes away and he carries on. And meanwhile Patricia Petibon totally steals the show as Blondchen, in a way only she can.

But anyway. Leaving aside the halfbaked character analysis, there is also the music to consider. What an insanely written role. Two big arias and one huge one, all in the first half of the opera and two of them essentially back to back. Whether I'm in the mood to adore Konstanze or to yell advice at her, I have huge respect for any soprano with the stamina and vocal ability to get through this in one shining piece. And I'm very interested to hear and see Emma Matthews in this role. I've mentioned (repeatedly, I suppose) my indifference to Emma so far. Actually I don't know if you could call it indifference. It's just a failure to be whipped into the same kind of frenzy about her as practically everybody else in whichever theatre she's singing in. Because after all, I'm not deaf. I can hear she has lovely voice. Neither am I blind. She's very appealing on stage. But still nothing about her has gripped me yet. This, though, is what brings me to Konstanze. So far I've only seen Emma in Rossini fluff and in a tackily staged Doll Song at the 50th anniversary gala last year. Konstanze is an entirely different kettle of fish, nothing cutesy or comic called for here — or at least I hope not. And the coloratura, while dazzling, requires far more penetrative power and dramatic edge to it than anything else I've heard her sing. It's an incredibly taxing role but that just makes a triumph in it all the more glorious. If she conquers it, she may just conquer me too; at least a little bit. I hope so. I'd like her to. After all, a soprano is a soprano and I'm me; adoring them is what I do best.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Floridante

Generally I tend to think the plot of an opera matters quite a lot. Even if it's stupid (and I don't necessarily think operatic plots are as frequently or extravagantly stupid as people sometimes make out) I do think it's important to know, at least roughly, what's going on. If some gorgeous singer is up there emoting his or her heart out, one ought to know what it's all about. But then I come across something like Handel's Floridante, and I wonder. I have, at last, made it all the way through the synopsis and so I think I vaguely know what happens now. But I only did so just this evening — whereas I've spent the last couple of weeks falling in love with the opera, oblivious to its bizarre intricacies of plot. I think with Handel, though, this is something you can get away with. The arias aren't about advancing the plot — they're about the expression of a given emotion. So you can comprehend and appreciate them while remaining all but clueless about the plot. In this way, I prevent myself from feeling guilty. It's not just a case "aren't they pretty sounds, who cares what they mean". I know what they mean. Handel makes sure we can hear what they mean. I just don't necessarily know how they fit into the mindboggling mess that is Floridante — prisons, poison, a Persian satrap, everyone in disguise, children swapped at birth, star-crossed lovers, treason, state politics and (almost) incest.

As I say — this is music well worth falling love with. I know I have. How is that I've been oblivious until now to the existence of Alan Curtis? You would think I'd have found him years ago and yet, no. But now I have discovered him and he's clearly a man after my own heart. This whole opera just bursts with baroque exquisiteness, it's Handel the way I dream of hearing it. Even at this stage of the Handel renaissance, Floridante remains a bit of an obscurity. This is its first full recording. It doesn't contain any of the big hits which show up on every second Handel Arias recital disc. So why does it sound so familiar. Partly, I suppose, because it's Handel, and Handel does always sound like himself. The arias follow familiar forms. We know what kind of accompaniment signals a storm metaphor, we know when someone's about to compare themselves to a bird and so on and so on. Still I don't think that's the whole explanation. I think there's something in Alan Curtis' approach which makes this opera seem like such an old, adored friend. He gives it such grandeur and such brilliance it simply doesn't seem possible that an opera like this could have languished in oblivion. Sometimes when you hear an obscurity, you can't help but think — there's a reason this is obscure. Not so here. It's not likely Floridante will enter the standard repertory any time soon. Of course it won't, and that's probably fair. But this recording could make you believe, for three hours at least, that it should.

And then there's Joyce. Have I mentioned lately how mad I am about Joyce DiDonato? Yes? Well there's more to come. Here she sings Elmira who, despite the title, is the real star of the opera. And not just because she's sung by Joyce, although that helps. A lot. I feel as if every single time I listen to Joyce sing, I hear something new to adore. With this recording, she has become one of those singers — the ones who make me sigh their name every few minutes while they're singing. The shimmer and sparkle and unearthly lightness in her voice take my breath away. I've known from the start that she was superb in Handel — the first time I heard her was her operatic duets with Patrizia Ciofi. What's special, though, is her adaptability within that repertoire. With Patrizia, she took all the male parts. Soldiers and princes. And was thoroughly persuasive throughout. Now as Elmira it's she who is the beleaguered heroine and she's just as vivid and just as beautiful, in an audibly different way — retaining all the mezzo richness and not a trace of the machismo. Her voice goes all the way from a deep golden lower register to a fairy floss top, seamless and agile and, well, just lovely. I think she's wonderful. This you can probably tell.

Enthralled as I am, I nevertheless have noticed the rest of the cast. They're hard to miss in fact. The impossible to type Marijana Mijanovic is excellent in the title role — a proper boyish contralto to match Joyce's pretty mezzo. She has the only two arias I recognised. "Bramo te sola" and "Se dolce m'era gia" both triggered my memory immediately. I knew I'd heard them somewhere but couldn't think where until I started mentally scanning my CD collection for Handel contraltos. Not Ewa. Nathalie! Both arias appear on Natalie Stutzmann's Handel disc, which I'd only listened to a few times — but Handel tends to stick with me, it seems. Sharon Rostorf-Zamir is our seconda donna, the adorable Rossane. Her pretty, fluttery sound took a little time to grow on me, but only a little. I don't know that it's a voice I would love in everything, and I wouldn't necessarily recognise it in a crowd, but for this role she's just the right choice. Roberta Invernizzi as Timante I liked straight away, but sadly she gets very little to sing. Vito Priante is brings nobility edged with lechery to the seriously badly behaved king Oronte. Oronte is the Woody Allen of Persia, creating all kinds of turmoil and trauma by attempting to marry his own adopted daughter. She, understandably enough, wants none of it — especially as he makes his move while she still thinks he's her biological father. Not clever. But Priante's singing makes him at least compelling, if not at all sympathetic.

I would like to create the illusion of credibility and impartiality by finding something to criticise about this Floridante, but I just can't. Maybe after I've lived with it a few months, or years, a flaw or two might emerge. This does happen sometimes with the things I fall in desperate love at first note with. For the moment though, there's nothing. I just love it, every moment of it.

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Monday morning music

Having spent the last couple of weeks in sighing paroxysms of delight over Joyce DiDonato's Elmira in Handel's Floridante (on which more soon), you can imagine my squeals of excitement to discover on Monday that I'm on her blogroll!! Turns out Glorious Joyce keeps a journal at her website; she also posts the entries in a blog entitled Yankee Diva. I don't think I've ever been as unbelievably thrilled — not to mention starstruck — to be on any blogroll as I am to be on this one. In such illustrious company, too: Maury, ACB , AUV and La Cieca and others besides. And, degrees of blogseparation aside, the blog is well worth reading — thoughtful, hilarious and totally fascinating. As if the outrageously fabulous singing weren't enough.

Another Monday morning discovery. I had half an hour to fill and decided to try something different. I went to my CD shelves, closed my eyes and chose a disc at random. I managed to get it out of the cover and into the player without seeing it. And pressed play. Expecting, naturally, to recognise whatever emerged. But instead I found myself suddenly in the midst of something I'd never heard before — Kathleen Ferrier singing Mahler's Kindertotenlieder. Can you imagine? I bought this CD months ago but had never played it — laziness combined with lack of emotional fortitude — so Fate, it seems, decided to take a hand. A revelatory recording in any context, of course — but when it was something it hadn't even entered my mind to expect, the effect was just indescribable, and perfect somehow. I listened to them again in the evening. And in between, revisited Lorraine Hunt Lieberson's Neruda Songs. I know it might sound like a mournful day's music but in truth it was just the opposite, a sustaining and strengthening kind of heartbreak. 

Monday, June 04, 2007

La Petibon sur YouTube

A few video treasures worth sharing.

Enfin! YouTube now has clips from the glorious, hilarious and thoroughly insane Arts Florissants production of Rameau's Les indes galantes. Even better, they feature the mad genius that is Patricia Petibon. Here she is with Nicolas Rivenq in the finale, "Forêts paisibles"; and here in Zima's "Regnez, plaisirs et jeux". But by miles and miles, my favouritest part and the one you must watch — this. (Inadvertently omitted link now added. So go and watch!) Not only is Patricia her insane and spectacular self, but it's one of the main reasons I'm totally head-over-heels in love with William Christie. You will be too. I promise. You cannot watch this clip and not fall eternally in love with him. And everybody else on stage. Without wishing to turn into a marketing tool for Opus Arte, honestly, your life is incomplete if you've never seen this show.

As for Patricia, well... many times I've wanted to write about her but she basically defies description. She's utterly unique. Riotously funny and completely mad in a way which nobody else could get away with. She only does, I think, because the persona, such as it is, is actually genuine; and because it's backed up by bucketloads of absolutely legitimate talent and immaculate technique. On her CD French Touch she sneezes her way through one aria, sings Hahn in an American accent and throws a bit of the Queen of the Night into the Doll Song. But she also plays it straight and it's always very clear that she can be just as impressive (and disarmingly beautiful) singing things the conventional way. You can see here a typically loopy rendition of the Doll Song — though believe me, she gets much crazier than this. The DVD of French Touch is just outstandingly surreal. She's what the travesty that is Natalie Choquette wishes she could be, but will never, ever attain. Unlike Das Choquette, La Petibon has style, prodigious talent and a natural gift for comedy. She also happens to be redheaded and just impossibly adorable. It all helps. 

Saturday, June 02, 2007

More Grace

I'm determined to be good and keep this Grace Bumbry revival going, so tonight is disc two — Verdi, Wagner and Brahms. The Verdi is interesting. Because most of time I'm not really a Verdi girl. Well that's not exactly true, because I do love it. I just love other parts of the repertoire even more. The baroque and I, for instance, are soulmates. Verdi and I, on the other hand, are the most part just very good friends. Except when I'm indifferent (that bizarre "Rataplan" bit in Forza for example) or when I declare certain passages among the most beautiful music in creation (Desdemona's Willow Song and Ave Maria; the final act prelude in La traviata). But because I was so obsessed with Grace and listened to this CD so much — sometimes I really couldn't begin my day without a fix of her Lady Macbeth — there are certain Verdi arias which are as deeply impressed upon my brain as, say, Sesto's "Parto, parto", or the entire role of Aspasia. Without Grace, I would probably have no more than a passing acquaintance with "Stride la vampa", which would normally be just a bit much for my delicate sensibilities. It isn't repertoire which, theoretically, I'm temperamentally suited to. But because there was (and is) Grace, well, it's all different. I know it inside out. I hum it to myself (or used to) and when I hear it sung by someone else, I greet it as an old friend.

As I did this afternoon, listening to the first half of a live Trovatore from Salzburg. The one with the cast so perfect it hurts. Leontyne Price, Giulietta Simionato, Franco Corelli and so on. I bought it secondhand for $10. Although slightly accidentally. What I thought I was buying was a studio recording — still with Leontyne — since that's what the cover indicated. Once I had it home I realised the truth. Whoever owned it previously had evidently lost the original cover — or just didn't like it — and decided to replace it with one from the studio recording; with everyone's name but Leontyne's blacked out. Glued to the back, a pin up of Corelli, cut out by hand. Sort of adorable, really. But of course this is hardly what you'd call an accident; I'm more than happy to own this recording instead as it's (of course) totally brilliant. Leontyne as always is a goddess. Franco is Franco. I won't go on because it's all so self-evident; you look at the cast and even their names on the page seem to radiate greatness.

Since I started this post the Verdi has finished. The Wagner excerpts too — a tiny, tantalising taste of her Venus in Tannhauser. So as I write, it's Brahms. And as much as I remember about this CD, I think nevertheless I had forgotten how sweet and lovely this part of it is. You'd hardly think that, just moments ago, it was the same woman spitting bile as Lady Macbeth — and now she's just as ideal here in art song tranquillity. But then, as a protegée of Lotte Lehmann, of course she's going to be a perfect Lieder singer. But oh my, this really is even lovelier than I recalled. Or maybe it's not that. Maybe it's me — maybe my appreciation for this sort of music has deepened in the time since I last heard Grace sing it. Either way this is a total dream. This is turning into liveblogging. I began this post with no intention to rhapsodize about her Brahms but how could I not? I think I remember thinking the same thing way back when — how can she be so thoroughly suited to the blood and thunder Italian repertoire, and ring out over vast orchestras, and then absolutely own these quiet, lyrical songs as well? There's just as much warmth, and she's just as captivating, but she scales down her forces to just the right size. I do love this voice. I've been missing the exciting operatic stuff but now that I'm here, I think this time around it's the Lieder I'm in love with. I guess it's as I said before. Whatever the musical pleasure you're seeking, Grace can probably provide it, in her own inimitable and entrancing style.